Everyone talks about the price. No one talks about the hidden costs of private homeownership.

Buying a condo doesn't just change where you live. It changes what you're responsible for - financially, legally, and collectively.

Condo living is often marketed as a lifestyle upgrade - sleek facilities, security, convenience, and a sense of prestige. But once the keys are collected and the excitement settles, many homeowners realise that buying a condo is not just about enjoying amenities. It is about becoming a co-owner of a self-governing estate, with shared financial responsibilities, collective decision-making, and rules that shape daily life.

The decision to buy a condo should be driven by practical considerations, such as timing, flexibility, and personal goals, rather than any desire to project status or prestige.

This article steps away from the glamour and focuses on what private homeowners really need to understand - the costs and challenges that rarely appear in brochures, but matter long after you move in.

Across various Reddit discussions and homeowner conversations, a few recurring themes surface when people talk candidly about condo living. Some point to the peace of mind that comes with security, maintenance support, and shared facilities they genuinely use. Others highlight frustrations over rising fees, limited space, and restrictions they didn't fully anticipate. A common thread, however, is that the value of condo living rarely lies in the headline features alone - it depends on how aligned the lifestyle, costs, and responsibilities are with how you actually live.

When you buy a condo, you do not simply own four walls and a balcony. You also own a share of the common property - the lifts, facade, mechanical systems, landscaping, and facilities that everyone uses. This shared ownership means that wear and tear, upgrades, and long-term maintenance are not abstract concepts; they eventually translate into collective decisions and collective costs.

All owners together form the Management Corporation Strata Title (MCST). Through this structure, owners elect a council and vote on how money is spent, which works are prioritised, and what rules govern daily living. Unlike public housing, where many decisions are centrally administered, condo living relies heavily on owner participation and consensus. In that sense, a condo operates less like a passive residence and more like a small, self-managed organisation.

The first hidden cost, therefore, is not monetary. It is the responsibility that comes with shared ownership - staying informed, participating when necessary, and accepting that not every decision will align perfectly with individual preferences.

For example, when a lift reaches the end of its lifespan or a repainting cycle is due, owners may disagree on timing, cost, or scope. But once a resolution is passed, every owner contributes - whether or not they supported the decision.

This is why many first-time buyers choose condos for value reasons, such as waiting time and flexibility, but only find the experience sustainable when they fully understand the responsibilities that come with private homeownership.

Condos operate on a self-governing model. Owners elect a council, similar to a board of directors, which oversees budgets, appoints vendors, sets estate priorities, and enforces house rules. While managing agents handle day-to-day operations on the ground, they act on instructions from the council and do not determine policy or long-term direction.

This structure works best when owners are informed and engaged. In practice, however, attendance at Annual General Meetings (AGMs) is often low. When only a small fraction of owners turn up, that group effectively decides how much everyone pays, which projects are prioritised, and how conservatively or aggressively the estate plans for the future. These decisions apply to every homeowner in the development, including those who did not participate in the vote.

A lot of the frustrations in condo living don't actually come from defects or maintenance issues - they come from shared boundaries and mismatched expectations. This is where bylaws tend to trip people up.

In practical terms, this means there are quite a few things you simply can't do, even though you technically own the unit. These restrictions generally fall into two categories: external-facing elements and structural uniformity.

You can't change your windows - not the size, not the colour, not even the tint. You can't permanently enclose your balcony. You can't swap out your main gate or door just because you prefer a different design. These are often the rules that catch owners off guard, especially those coming from non-strata housing.

From the estate's perspective, these restrictions exist to maintain a consistent look and ensure fairness across all units. But for individual owners, they can feel surprisingly limiting if you didn't realise what you were signing up for.

It is also important to distinguish between prescribed bylaws, which form a standard baseline across developments, and subjective bylaws, which are specific to each estate. Subjective bylaws are typically proposed, debated, and voted on at AGMs. Once passed and formally lodged, they carry legal weight and can be enforced, even if individual owners personally disagree with them.

Choosing not to participate just because you feel that it is troublesome or you cannot be bothered does not eliminate the responsibility. It simply means surrendering influence over decisions that shape both daily living and long-term costs.

Most buyers notice the monthly maintenance fee and mentally file it away as a fixed, unavoidable cost. Many stop there - without asking whether the fund levels are actually sufficient for the estate's age, scale, and upcoming obligations. What many don't realise is that this number alone doesn't tell you very much about the financial health of the condo - or what might be coming down the road when the building starts to age.

The management fund is what keeps the place running day to day. This pays for security guards, cleaners, landscaping, routine servicing, small repairs, and the managing agent's fees. If the estate feels clean, functional, and reasonably well-run, this fund is usually doing its job.

The sinking fund is where things get more interesting - and where many owners only start paying attention a little too late. This fund is meant for big-ticket, long-term items that don't happen every year but are guaranteed to happen eventually: repainting cycles, lift modernisation, water tanks, generator sets, and major mechanical or electrical works. These are predictable over a building's life cycle, but expensive when they arrive.

This is also where the gap between perception and reality often shows up. A condo can look premium and feel well-managed today because the day-to-day operations are smooth, while quietly building up risk in the background if the sinking fund isn't being topped up properly. When that happens, the financial pressure doesn't disappear - it simply gets deferred, and usually comes back suddenly.

If you really want to understand what you're buying into, the useful information goes beyond what you can see on a site visit. Owners - and buyers with a legitimate interest - can request documents such as financial statements, sinking fund trends, AGM minutes, and details of upcoming major works. On top of that, tools like BCA's Quality Housing Portal (QHP) can offer additional reference points on a project's construction quality and track record. Taken together, these give you a much clearer sense of whether the estate is planning ahead or just reacting as problems surface.

Over the longer term, this also affects how easy or difficult future decisions become. Well-funded estates tend to have more flexibility, whether it's handling major repairs calmly or navigating redevelopment and collective sale discussions. Poorly funded ones, on the other hand, often face tougher conversations, sharper disagreements, and greater resistance from owners when money needs to be raised.

Special levies are one-off payments imposed when existing funds are insufficient to cover major works. They are often the biggest shock for first-time private homeowners, mainly because most people assume their monthly maintenance fees already cover everything the estate might need.

In reality, special levies usually surface when long-term works can no longer be deferred and become unavoidable. These are not cosmetic improvements, but essential works required to keep the building safe and functional.

Imagine upgrading to a resale condo, confident that your finances are settled and neatly planned. In many cases, this is also when buyers feel most financially stretched - having just completed a major purchase. A few months later, the MCST announces a round of major upgrades following inspections or tender reviews. The sinking fund turns out to be inadequate, and owners are required to contribute a sizable one-time levy, often with relatively short notice.

This is where expectations tend to collide with reality. Special levies are not optional, and they are payable regardless of personal cashflow planning or whether you personally voted in favour of the works. Monthly mortgage instalments may feel predictable, but condo obligations rarely are - and they tend to show up precisely when owners least expect them.

Maintenance fees and levies are not split evenly among owners. They are calculated based on share value, which often correlates with unit size and configuration.

This means larger units generally contribute more - not because they use facilities more, but because they own a larger share of the estate. When special levies arise, this difference becomes even more pronounced.

Non-payment of maintenance fees or levies does not simply disappear. Most MCSTs follow a structured escalation process, starting with reminder notices and progressing to demand letters, interest charges, and administrative fees. In prolonged cases, legal recovery action may follow.

Some estates may offer instalment arrangements depending on governance decisions and financial policies, but disagreement with a resolution does not suspend payment obligations.

This is where the question shifts. Moving into a private property is rarely just about affordability - it is about readiness for the responsibilities that come with it - a decision framework we explore further in Should I Upgrade or Take the Plunge Into Private Property?.

Private homeownership can absolutely be rewarding. But condo living only works well when buyers understand that they are stepping into a shared system - one that requires participation, financial discipline, and a willingness to live with collective decisions.

The pools, gyms, and glossy brochures may draw you in, but what really defines the experience is how the estate is governed, how responsibly it plans for the future, and how prepared you are to deal with costs that don't come neatly packaged into a monthly figure.

The real cost of condo living is not hidden - it's simply overlooked until you become part of the system.

Views expressed in this article belong to the writer(s) and do not reflect PropNex's position. No part of this content may be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published, or broadcast in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of PropNex.

For permission to use, reproduce, or distribute any content, please contact the Corporate Communications department. PropNex reserves the right to modify or update this disclaimer at any time without prior notice.